Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing Quadro K3000M and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3000M and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 246 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 2796 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K3000M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 63% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14E-Q1 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | no data |
Pipelines | 576 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K3000M vs Radeon HD 6790
- Quadro K3000M vs FirePro M4000
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 6790
- Radeon R9 A375 vs FirePro M4000
- Quadro K3000M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro K3000M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M