Quadro K3100M vs Radeon R9 A375
When choosing between Quadro K3100M and Radeon R9 A375, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K3100M and Radeon R9 A375.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3100M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 194 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 3196 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro K3100M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 61% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 110% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3100M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | no data |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K3100M vs GRID K280Q
- Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
- Quadro K3100M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro K3100M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M