Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4100M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4100M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 194 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 3196 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 121% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4100M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | no data |
Pipelines | 1152 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Quadro K4100M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro K4100M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M