Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R9 A375
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M1000M and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M1000M stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M1000M and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 93 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro M1000M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 4996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 175% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 420% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 60% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro M1000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M1000M vs GeForce GTX 680M
- Quadro M1000M vs GeForce MX350
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 680M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce MX350
- Quadro M1000M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M1000M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M