Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire.
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is 4796 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Wimbledon XT | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 May 2012 | no data |
Pipelines | 2560 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M