Radeon R7 M270 vs Radeon R9 A375
When choosing between Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R9 A375, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R9 A375.
Radeon R9 A375
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R7 M270 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 92% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M270 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal XT / Mars | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2014 | no data |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |