Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
In this comparison between Radeon R9 A375 and Radeon RX 480 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 A375 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 480 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 A375 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Radeon R9 A375 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- Radeon R9 A375 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 7996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Fortnite is 137% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Metro Exodus is 366% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Venus | Polaris |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 1 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1077 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 155.1 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,963 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000