Radeon R9 A375 vs Tesla C2050

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R9 A375 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R9 A375 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Radeon R9 A375

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	Radeon R9 A375	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)		238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Radeon R9 A375 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R9 A375 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	95−100	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	70−75
4K / 2160p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	65−70	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	10−11	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375.

Full Specs

	Radeon R9 A375	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Venus	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	no data	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	900 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	925 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	37.00	32.14
Floating-point performance		1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4.5 GB/s	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

Radeon R9 A375 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares