Radeon R9 A375 vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R9 A375 and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R9 A375 stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 A375
Tesla M10
Main Specs
Radeon R9 A375 | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 A375 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 133 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Radeon R9 A375 and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 5196 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 A375 | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Venus | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | no data | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |