Quadro 7000 vs Radeon R9 Fury

In this comparison between Quadro 7000 and Radeon R9 Fury you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 Fury will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 7000

Radeon R9 Fury Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro 7000	Radeon R9 Fury
Power consumption (TDP)	204 Watt	275 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Radeon R9 Fury has 34% more power consumption, than Quadro 7000.
Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 Fury uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 Fury.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 Fury - with GCN 1.2.
Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 Fury - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 2904 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 Fury.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	18−20	50−55
ultra / 1080p	10−11	30−35
QHD / 1440p	4−5	27−30
4K / 2160p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	75−80
medium / 1080p	21−24	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Quadro 7000.
high / 1080p	27−30	75−80
ultra / 1080p	24−27	70−75
QHD / 1440p	8−9	55−60
4K / 2160p	6−7	27−30
low / 720p	60−65	130−140
medium / 1080p	30−35	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Battlefield 5 is 181% more, than Quadro 7000.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	50−55	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
low / 768p	220−230	250−260
medium / 768p	190−200	230−240
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
QHD / 1440p	70−75	150−160
4K / 2160p	35−40	100−110
high / 768p	150−160	220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Quadro 7000.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro 7000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	70−75	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Quadro 7000.
high / 1080p	21−24	65−70
ultra / 1080p	20−22	60−65
QHD / 1440p	18−20	40−45
4K / 2160p	6−7	21−24
low / 720p	45−50	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Far Cry 5 is 165% more, than Quadro 7000.
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
QHD / 1440p	14−16	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	110−120	220−230
medium / 1080p	60−65	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Fortnite is 141% more, than Quadro 7000.
high / 1080p	30−33	85−90
ultra / 1080p	21−24	65−70
QHD / 1440p	10−12	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
low / 720p	60−65	130−140
medium / 1080p	30−35	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than Quadro 7000.
low / 768p	95−100	160−170
medium / 768p	85−90	150−160
high / 1080p	35−40	95−100
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	5−6	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Quadro 7000.
high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	95−100
medium / 1080p	14−16	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Metro Exodus is 213% more, than Quadro 7000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro 7000.
high / 1080p	−	75−80
ultra / 1080p	14−16	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	65−70	120−130
medium / 1080p	18−20	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than Quadro 7000.
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	35−40	95−100
medium / 1080p	18−20	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 170% more, than Quadro 7000.
low / 768p	65−70	180−190
medium / 768p	40−45	120−130
high / 1080p	21−24	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
4K / 2160p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro 7000.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	35−40	65−70
high / 768p	55−60	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Quadro 7000.

Full Specs

	Quadro 7000	Radeon R9 Fury
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.2
Code name	GF110	Fiji
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 May 2012	16 June 2015
Pipelines	512	3584
Core clock speed	651 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	3,000 million	8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	41.66	224.0
Floating-point performance	1,332 gflops	7,168 gflops
Length	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	3404 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	163.4 GB/s	512 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	2.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		800 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
TrueAudio		+
Mantle		+
Bridgeless CrossFire		+
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
VCE		+
DDMA audio		+
Compute units		56
AppAcceleration		+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
FRTC		+
		Check Price

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon R9 Fury

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares