Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 Fury

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 Fury. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 Fury. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Radeon R9 Fury Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 Fury
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	275 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	128 Bit	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R9 Fury has 266% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 Fury have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 Fury - with GCN 1.2.
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 Fury are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 6112 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 Fury.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	50−55
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	6−7	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	75−80
medium / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 131% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	30−35	75−80
ultra / 1080p	27−30	70−75
QHD / 1440p	12−14	55−60
4K / 2160p	8−9	27−30
low / 720p	65−70	130−140
medium / 1080p	35−40	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 Fury.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	230−240
ultra / 1080p	120−130	−
QHD / 1440p	90−95	150−160
4K / 2160p	50−55	100−110
high / 768p	170−180	220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	24−27	65−70
ultra / 1080p	21−24	60−65
QHD / 1440p	18−20	40−45
4K / 2160p	8−9	21−24
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Far Cry 5 is 134% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	30−35	90−95
ultra / 1080p	24−27	70−75
QHD / 1440p	16−18	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	120−130	220−230
medium / 1080p	70−75	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Fortnite is 114% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	35−40	85−90
ultra / 1080p	27−30	65−70
QHD / 1440p	14−16	50−55
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−35
low / 720p	70−75	130−140
medium / 1080p	40−45	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Forza Horizon 4 is 126% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	100−110	160−170
medium / 768p	95−100	150−160
high / 1080p	40−45	95−100
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	7−8	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	12−14	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	30−35
QHD / 1440p	10−11	24−27
4K / 2160p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	18−20	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Metro Exodus is 168% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
Quadro M2000 and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	−	75−80
ultra / 1080p	14−16	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	70−75	120−130
medium / 1080p	18−20	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 157% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	10−12
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	21−24	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 156% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	75−80	180−190
medium / 768p	45−50	120−130
high / 1080p	24−27	70−75
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
4K / 2160p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 164% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	40−45	65−70
high / 768p	55−60	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Quadro M2000.

Full Specs

	Quadro M2000	Radeon R9 Fury
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.2
Code name	GM206	Fiji
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	8 April 2016	16 June 2015
Pipelines	768	3584
Core clock speed	796 MHz
Boost Clock	1163 MHz	1000 MHz
Transistor count	2,940 million	8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	55.82	224.0
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	7,168 gflops
Length	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth		512 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	6.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.2
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	215 Mh/s	800 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
TrueAudio		+
Mantle		+
Bridgeless CrossFire		+
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
VCE		+
DDMA audio		+
Compute units		56
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
AppAcceleration		+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
FRTC		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 Fury

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares