GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon R9 FURY X
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 FURY X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 FURY X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 755M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Radeon R9 FURY X
Power consumption (TDP)
2x ~50 Watt
275 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
2x 2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 FURY X has 13650% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
Radeon R9 FURY X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
GeForce GT 755M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 FURY X - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 755M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 FURY X - with GCN 3.0.
GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 FURY X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M SLI is 4350 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
50−55
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
80−85
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
QHD / 1440p
2−3
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
130−140
medium / 1080p
24−27
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
low / 768p
200−210
250−260
medium / 768p
170−180
230−240
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
QHD / 1440p
50−55
150−160
4K / 2160p
24−27
100−110
high / 768p
140−150
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
60−65
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
65−70
ultra / 1080p
14−16
60−65
QHD / 1440p
−
40−45
4K / 2160p
5−6
21−24
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
24−27
90−95
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
QHD / 1440p
12−14
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
21−24
low / 720p
95−100
220−230
medium / 1080p
50−55
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Fortnite is 182% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
24−27
85−90
ultra / 1080p
18−20
65−70
QHD / 1440p
7−8
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
low / 720p
50−55
130−140
medium / 1080p
27−30
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Forza Horizon 4 is 234% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
160−170
medium / 768p
75−80
150−160
high / 1080p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Grand Theft Auto V is 146% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
95−100
medium / 1080p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Metro Exodus is 292% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
−
75−80
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
55−60
120−130
medium / 1080p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 200% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−12
low / 720p
27−30
95−100
medium / 1080p
16−18
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 237% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
190−200
medium / 768p
30−35
120−130
high / 1080p
18−20
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−11
40−45
4K / 2160p
6−7
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 283% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
30−35
65−70
high / 768p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Radeon R9 FURY X
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Code name
N14P-?
Fiji
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
1 November 2013
24 June 2015
Pipelines
768
4096
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2x 1300 Million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
268.8
Floating-point performance
8,602 gflops
Length
191 mm
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
+
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
858 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Bridgeless CrossFire
+
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
33.4 Mh/s
Compute units
64
AppAcceleration
+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price