Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 FURY X
In this comparison between Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 FURY X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro 460 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 FURY X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon R9 FURY X
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
275 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 FURY X has 685% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Radeon Pro 460 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 FURY X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon R9 FURY X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Radeon Pro 460 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 FURY X - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro 460 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 FURY X - with GCN 3.0.
Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 FURY X - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3950 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
50−55
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
75−80
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 177% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
27−30
80−85
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
QHD / 1440p
7−8
55−60
4K / 2160p
6−7
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−35
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
50−55
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
low / 768p
220−230
250−260
medium / 768p
190−200
230−240
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
QHD / 1440p
65−70
150−160
4K / 2160p
35−40
100−110
high / 768p
150−160
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
21−24
65−70
ultra / 1080p
18−20
60−65
QHD / 1440p
18−20
40−45
4K / 2160p
6−7
21−24
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Far Cry 5 is 177% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
QHD / 1440p
14−16
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
21−24
low / 720p
110−120
220−230
medium / 1080p
60−65
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Fortnite is 141% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
30−33
85−90
ultra / 1080p
21−24
65−70
QHD / 1440p
10−12
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
low / 720p
60−65
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−35
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
95−100
160−170
medium / 768p
85−90
150−160
high / 1080p
35−40
95−100
ultra / 1080p
14−16
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
10−12
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−35
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
95−100
medium / 1080p
14−16
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Metro Exodus is 235% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
−
75−80
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
65−70
120−130
medium / 1080p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
95−100
medium / 1080p
18−20
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 184% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
60−65
190−200
medium / 768p
40−45
120−130
high / 1080p
21−24
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
40−45
4K / 2160p
7−8
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 217% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
35−40
65−70
high / 768p
55−60
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon Pro 460.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon R9 FURY X
Architecture
Polaris
GCN 3.0
Code name
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Fiji
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
8 August 2016
24 June 2015
Pipelines
1024
4096
Core clock speed
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
268.8
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
8,602 gflops
Length
191 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
FreeSync
+
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
858 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Bridgeless CrossFire
+
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
33.4 Mh/s
Compute units
64
AppAcceleration
+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price
