FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Radeon R9 M270X
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M270X are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 10 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 42% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 17% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Opal | Venus |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |