FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 225 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | n/a | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |