GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 242 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 13% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P-GT | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |