GeForce GTX 560M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N12E-GS | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2011 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
SLI options | 2-way | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |