GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M270X

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 650 Ti Radeon R9 M270X
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI No outputs
  Check Price
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti is 203 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 1120 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 12−14 6−7
ultra / 1080p 7−8 4−5
QHD / 1440p 2−3 0−1
low / 720p 27−30 16−18
medium / 1080p 16−18 8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 650 Ti Radeon R9 M270X
Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK106 Venus
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 9 October 2012 21 March 2014
Pipelines 768 640
Core clock speed 928 MHz 725 MHz
Boost Clock 775 MHz
Transistor count 2,540 million 1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 59.2 billion/sec 31.00
Floating-point performance 1,425 gflops 1,536 gflops
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5.4 GB/s 1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s 72 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.3 4.4
OpenCL 1.2 Not Listed
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.1 kh/s
FreeSync +
CUDA cores 768
Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support 4 Displays
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 49 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
DualGraphics +
ZeroCore +
Switchable graphics +
Mantle +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.26 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 5 Mh/s
Compute units 10
  Check Price