GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670M and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 127 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 375 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |