GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 765M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M SLI is 2875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Fortnite is 118% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 171% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 765M SLI in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Venus | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2x 2540 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370