GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 304 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 213% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 221% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Venus | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2x 1870 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon HD 7970
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs FirePro S10000
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon HD 7970
- Radeon R9 M270X vs FirePro S10000
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370