GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 229 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 177% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 192% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 780M
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 880M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370