GRID K240Q vs Radeon R9 M270X

When comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K240Q

Radeon R9 M270X

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Radeon R9 M270X
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R9 M270X has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	6−7
ultra / 1080p	6−7	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	16−18	10−12
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	130−140
medium / 768p	140−150	100−110
ultra / 1080p	75−80	50−55
QHD / 1440p	40−45	27−30
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	110−120	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	12−14	8−9
ultra / 1080p	10−12	7−8
4K / 2160p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−11
low / 720p	75−80	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	65−70	50−55
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
high / 1080p	20−22	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	7−8	4−5
ultra / 1080p	5−6	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	12−14
medium / 1080p	9−10	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	90−95	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−105	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	10−12
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	35−40	24−27
medium / 768p	24−27	16−18
high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	8−9	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	40−45
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
high / 768p	45−50	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Radeon R9 M270X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Venus
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	21 March 2014
Pipelines	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		775 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	31.00
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,536 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0 x16
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10

GRID K240Q vs Radeon R9 M270X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares