Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 540 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 540 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Iris Graphics 540 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 540 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce MX150
- Iris Graphics 540 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370