Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon R9 M270X vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370