Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370