Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 3141 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 421% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | iDG1LPDEV | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 31 October 2020 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 670
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370