Quadro K1100M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Quadro K1100M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K1100M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K1100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 20 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 1675 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 35% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |