Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4100M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K4100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro K4100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 19 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 2075 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K4100M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4100M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15E-Q3-A2 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1152 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
- Quadro K4100M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370