Quadro M1200 vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M1200 and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M1200 and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M1200 and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M1200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 266 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Quadro M1200 and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 118% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 183% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17P-Q1 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 991 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |