Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 357 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 62% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 12 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 26 September 2019 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.44 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370