Radeon R9 M270X vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M270X and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M270X will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M270X
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Radeon R9 M270X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon R9 M270X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon R9 M270X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2007 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
80−85
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
24−27
60−65
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M270X
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Venus
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
21 March 2014
25 July 2011
Pipelines
640
448
Core clock speed
725 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
31.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,536 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1125 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
Not Listed
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Compute units
10
Check Price
