FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M275
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M275 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 337% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 114% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 640% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 122 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |