FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M275
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M275. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M275. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M275.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M275. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Tahiti | Venus |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 August 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 122 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |