FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 M275
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M275. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M275. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M275.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 101 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 762% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Hawaii | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 122 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |