GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M275
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M275. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M275. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M275 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 605 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 3500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 612% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 1180% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 487% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 744% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 352% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 462% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 690% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | − | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M275. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M275 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN |
Code name | TU117 | Venus |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 1 August 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |