GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M275, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M275.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M275.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 317 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 3501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Venus |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |