GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M275
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 297 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 492 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK106 | Venus |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |