GRID K160Q vs Radeon R9 M275
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M275, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M275.
GRID K160Q
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 75 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 2718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GRID K160Q and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Fortnite is 39% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK107 | Venus |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 August 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |