GRID K240Q vs Radeon R9 M275
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 180 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 112% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 48% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |