GRID M60 1Q vs Radeon R9 M275
In this comparison between GRID M60 1Q and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 1Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 1Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 368 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GRID M60 1Q and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 512 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 337% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID M60 1Q and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−105 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 114% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 660% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 268% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 1Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |