GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon R9 M275
When comparing GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M275, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M275 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M275.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 368 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 512 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 287% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 580% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |