P106 090 vs Radeon R9 M275
When comparing P106 090 and Radeon R9 M275, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between P106 090 and Radeon R9 M275 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 090
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 429 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 3508 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 212% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 287% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
| Code name | GP106 | Venus |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |