Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M275

In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Radeon R9 M275 Check Price

Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M275 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M275 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Radeon R9 M275 here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Radeon R9 M275 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon R9 M275
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 3600 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	110−120
medium / 768p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	7−8	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
high / 768p	16−18	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 182% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	10−11	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	10−12
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	7−8
low / 768p	18−20	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	3−4
ultra / 1080p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	7−8
medium / 1080p	−	4−5
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Minecraft is 50% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	8−9
low / 768p	0−1	16−18
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
high / 768p	12−14	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon R9 M275
Architecture	Fermi	GCN
Code name	Fermi	Venus
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 February 2011	1 August 2014
Pipelines	192	640
Core clock speed	550 MHz	925 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	37.00
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops	1,184 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s	122 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M275

Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M275 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares