Quadro 7000 vs Radeon R9 M275
In this comparison between Quadro 7000 and Radeon R9 M275 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M275 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 7000
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M275.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 274 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 1096 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 520% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 311% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GF110 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 May 2012 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |