Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R9 M275
When comparing Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M275, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M275 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 195 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Oland | Venus |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 June 2016 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |