FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M280X
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M280X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M280X.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M280X.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M280X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 366% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 223% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 164% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 257% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 337% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Saturn XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | Not Listed |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |