Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R9 M280X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 M280X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 M280X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 300 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Fortnite is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Saturn XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |