Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M280X
When comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M280X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M280X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 298 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Fortnite is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Saturn XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |