Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon R9 M280X
When comparing Radeon Pro W5500M and Radeon R9 M280X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro W5500M and Radeon R9 M280X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro W5500M | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- Radeon Pro W5500M is build with RDNA 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M280X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Radeon Pro W5500M and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 147% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro W5500M | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Saturn XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 February 2020 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |